Results: UNC-Wilmington


#1

Perhaps not the best time based on the estimated mood of my peers, but here are tonight’s results:

1 devon 3 13.928 3.162 76 68 69 80 49 144 13.892
2 POMEROY 2 14.866 76 67 69 80 49 169 14.765
3 slash 3 4.123 2.236 79 69 69 80 100 121 14.866
4 duff 2 11.045 78 68 69 80 81 144 15.000
5 larryh 3 5.000 3.162 77 66 69 80 64 196 16.125
6 jakkl 1 82 69 69 80 169 121 17.029
7 craftsy21 3 4.243 16.125 78 65 69 80 81 225 17.493
8 chicago lion 1 72 62 69 80 9 324 18.248
9 bstanf 3 4.123 9.220 73 62 69 80 16 324 18.439
10 danlauver 1 75 62 69 80 36 324 18.974
11 pennstateno1 3 3.162 7.280 77 62 69 80 64 324 19.698
12 ronb89 3 8.602 9.055 83 66 69 80 196 196 19.799
13 eric17 3 13.892 7.071 83 66 69 80 196 196 19.799
14 blue2blue 3 5.385 2.236 70 60 69 80 1 400 20.025
15 psuballer 2 1.000 76 61 69 80 49 361 20.248
16 speed 3 14.142 5.099 70 59 69 80 1 441 21.024
17 lpcreation 3 9.434 13.342 70 59 69 80 1 441 21.024
18 pezlion 1 79 61 69 80 100 361 21.471
19 nittanyillini 3 23.431 5.385 83 63 69 80 196 289 22.023
20 mhenry41 4 15.000 9.220 76 59 69 80 49 441 22.136
21 friznitz5 3 1.000 2.828 77 59 69 80 64 441 22.472
22 psugrad83 3 2.236 9.899 75 58 69 80 36 484 22.804
23 GROUP 2 5.140 3.064 72.09 57.09 69 80 9.548 524.868 23.117
24 finding forrester 3 6.325 14.036 74 57 69 80 25 529 23.537
25 mjg 3 3.606 7.280 82 60 69 80 169 400 23.854
26 jjepsu92 3 23.854 4.123 79 58 69 80 100 484 24.166
27 laodan 2 8.062 80 58 69 80 121 484 24.597
28 bleedpsu 2 2.236 82 59 69 80 169 441 24.698
29 whiteout 2 3.606 69 55 69 80 0 625 25.000
30 beernitlion 2 8.544 74 55 69 80 25 625 25.495
31 ngameday 3 8.246 15.000 85 60 69 80 256 400 25.612
32 tundra 3 6.000 8.944 75 55 69 80 36 625 25.710
33 byake 2 5.385 76 53 69 80 49 729 27.893
34 cramx3 2 8.544 64 52 69 80 25 784 28.443
35 jyd 3 62.650 8.000 78 52 69 80 81 784 29.411

Overall Standings:

Player	GP	Penn	RbtMor	UNCW	

1 bem5047 1 2.000 2.000
2 soskichparty 2 7.071 5.000 6.036
3 slash 3 4.123 2.236 14.866 7.075
4 psugeologyguy 1 7.280 7.280
5 larryh 3 5.000 3.162 16.125 8.096
6 friznitz5 3 1.000 2.828 22.472 8.767
7 blue2blue 3 5.385 2.236 20.025 9.215
8 pennstateno1 3 3.162 7.280 19.698 10.047
9 devon 3 13.928 3.162 13.892 10.328
10 bstanf 3 4.123 9.220 18.439 10.594
11 psuballer 2 1.000 20.248 10.624
12 mjg 3 3.606 7.280 23.854 11.580
13 mhenry41 4 15.000 9.220 22.136 11.589
14 psugrad83 3 2.236 9.899 22.804 11.646
15 ronb89 3 8.602 9.055 19.799 12.486
16 craftsy21 3 4.243 16.125 17.493 12.620
17 duff 2 11.045 15.000 13.023
18 speed 3 14.142 5.099 21.024 13.422
19 bleedpsu 2 2.236 24.698 13.467
20 tundra 3 6.000 8.944 25.710 13.551
21 eric17 3 13.892 7.071 19.799 13.588
22 whiteout 2 3.606 25.000 14.303
23 lpcreation 3 9.434 13.342 21.024 14.600
24 finding forrester 3 6.325 14.036 23.537 14.632
25 POMEROY 2 14.866 14.765 14.815
26 GROUP 2 5.140 3.064 23.117 15.661
27 ngameday 3 8.246 15.000 25.612 16.286
28 laodan 2 8.062 24.597 16.330
29 byake 2 5.385 27.893 16.639
30 nittanyillini 3 23.431 5.385 22.023 16.946
31 beernitlion 2 8.544 25.495 17.020
32 jakkl 1 17.029 17.029
33 jjepsu92 3 23.854 4.123 24.166 17.381
34 chicago lion 1 18.248 18.248
35 cramx3 2 8.544 28.443 18.493
36 danlauver 1 18.974 18.974
37 pezlion 1 21.471 21.471
38 jyd 3 62.650 8.000 29.411 33.354


#2

wow - i made a nice little jump. And I wasn’t even close… i’d hate to think how the rest of your projections looked lol.


#3

You’ve got a couple of problems with your data.

One, it appears that you are counting guys who didn’t submit any data for this game with a 0-0 prediction for today’s game. That’s not fair.

Two, you incorrectly sorted the results for this game. You have a primary sort on games played with a secondary sort on the result. The primary sort should be on the result.


#4

[quote=“UncleLar, post:3, topic:295”]You’ve got a couple of problems with your data.

One, it appears that you are counting guys who didn’t submit any data for this game with a 0-0 prediction for today’s game. That’s not fair.

Two, you incorrectly sorted the results for this game. You have a primary sort on games played with a secondary sort on the result. The primary sort should be on the result.[/quote]

Not sure how that happened. As far as the primary sort on games played, I was lookign at the results based on the guys who have played every game thus far and forgot to sort it back.


#5
[quote="UncleLar, post:3, topic:295"]You've got a couple of problems with your data.

One, it appears that you are counting guys who didn’t submit any data for this game with a 0-0 prediction for today’s game. That’s not fair.

Two, you incorrectly sorted the results for this game. You have a primary sort on games played with a secondary sort on the result. The primary sort should be on the result.[/quote]

Not sure how that happened. As far as the primary sort on games played, I was lookign at the results based on the guys who have played every game thus far and forgot to sort it back.

Looks like bem5047 just plans on sitting on his laurels and not playing anymore. ;D


#6
[quote="UncleLar, post:3, topic:295"]You've got a couple of problems with your data.

One, it appears that you are counting guys who didn’t submit any data for this game with a 0-0 prediction for today’s game. That’s not fair.

Two, you incorrectly sorted the results for this game. You have a primary sort on games played with a secondary sort on the result. The primary sort should be on the result.[/quote]

Not sure how that happened. As far as the primary sort on games played, I was lookign at the results based on the guys who have played every game thus far and forgot to sort it back.

Looks like bem5047 just plans on sitting on his laurels and not playing anymore. ;D

Ha, thats why I was looking at the results based on who has played every game. Seems like a more realistic overall standing. :smiley:


#7
[quote="UncleLar, post:3, topic:295"]You've got a couple of problems with your data.

One, it appears that you are counting guys who didn’t submit any data for this game with a 0-0 prediction for today’s game. That’s not fair.

Two, you incorrectly sorted the results for this game. You have a primary sort on games played with a secondary sort on the result. The primary sort should be on the result.[/quote]

Not sure how that happened. As far as the primary sort on games played, I was lookign at the results based on the guys who have played every game thus far and forgot to sort it back.

Looks like bem5047 just plans on sitting on his laurels and not playing anymore. ;D

Ha, thats why I was looking at the results based on who has played every game. Seems like a more realistic overall standing. :smiley:

You need to establish a cutoff to be ranked. Something like 3/4 of every game played.


#8

Good idea unclelar. I will only post players in the overall stats when they reach 75% of games played.